This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
标题: Decorators should have an index entry
类型: enhancement Stage:
Components: Documentation Versions: Python 2.5.3, Python 2.4, Python 2.6, Python 2.5
process
状态: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: 后续:
分配给: georg.brandl 抄送列表: dvusboy, georg.brandl
优先级: normal 关键字:

Created on 2008-12-04 00:28 by dvusboy, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (4)
msg76857 - (view) Author: K. C. Wong (dvusboy) 日期: 2008-12-04 00:28
While decorators have been introduced since Python 2.4, there continues to 
be no index reference to it in the Python Language Reference. Given this 
being a major language feature, I think it is an oversight.
msg77031 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) 日期: 2008-12-05 15:30
In the 2.6 and 3.0 docs, decorators do have an index entry, see
http://docs.python.org/genindex-D.html.
msg77039 - (view) Author: K. C. Wong (dvusboy) 日期: 2008-12-05 17:04
My mistake for including 2.6. While having a link to an entry in the 
Glossary is a huge improvement, it comes about as a result of the index 
now covering all components of the Python documentation. I feel at the 
least, there should be a link within the glossary entry back to the 
appropriate sections in the Language Reference.
msg77048 - (view) Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * (Python committer) 日期: 2008-12-05 18:00
OK, I've added a back-link in r67591.
历史
日期 用户 动作 参数
2022-04-11 14:56:42admin修改github: 48761
2008-12-05 18:00:22georg.brandl修改消息: + msg77048
2008-12-05 17:04:19dvusboy修改消息: + msg77039
2008-12-05 15:30:58georg.brandl修改状态: open -> closed
resolution: fixed
消息: + msg77031
2008-12-04 00:28:33dvusboy创建