消息 [104310]
Re: ExtendedContext, the comments in decimal.py say:
# Pre-made alternate contexts offered by the specification
# Don't change these; the user should be able to select these
# contexts and be able to reproduce results from other implementations
# of the spec.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, since (as Stefan says) the choice of precision 9 doesn't seem to come from the specification.
However, the current ExtendedContext is used extensively in doctests and elsewhere; it would be awkward to change it now. I think adding the IEEE formats and encouraging users to use those in place of ExtendedContext might be the best bet.
I'd also still want to make _clamp public in this case, to avoid people wondering why two apparently identical contexts (one with _clamp=1, one with _clamp=0) can lead to different results. |
|
| 日期 |
用户 |
动作 |
参数 |
| 2010-04-27 10:50:33 | mark.dickinson | 修改 | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, rhettinger, facundobatista, skrah |
| 2010-04-27 10:50:33 | mark.dickinson | 修改 | messageid: <1272365433.03.0.752179029322.issue8540@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-04-27 10:50:31 | mark.dickinson | 链接 | issue8540 messages |
| 2010-04-27 10:50:31 | mark.dickinson | 创建 | |
|