消息 [119044]
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> We either needed to (1) add an unsigned Py_hash_t type or (2) just use size_t and Py_ssize_t.
>
Option (2) may actually be preferable because dict and set
implementations rely on Py_hash_t being compatible with Py_ssize_t.
See issue 1646068. |
|
| 日期 |
用户 |
动作 |
参数 |
| 2010-10-18 17:31:52 | belopolsky | 修改 | recipients:
+ belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, ked-tao, benjamin.peterson |
| 2010-10-18 17:31:49 | belopolsky | 链接 | issue9778 messages |
| 2010-10-18 17:31:49 | belopolsky | 创建 | |
|