➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

作者 neologix
收信人 bobbyi, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou, vstinner
日期 2011-05-05.05:41:46
SpamBayes Score 5.719935e-09
Marked as misclassified 否
Message-id <BANLkTinHvA-re2T-d==BmVp+_E-0t8D0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <BANLkTi=WW6=Xqv_=JjiFA8UyWVdLKwsoKw@mail.gmail.com>
内容
Please disregard my comment on PyEval_ReInitThreads and _after_fork:
it will of course still be necessary, because it does much more than
just reinitializing locks (e.g. stop threads).
Also, note that both approaches don't handle synchronization
primitives other  than bare Lock and RLock. For example, Condition and
Event used in the threading module wouldn't be reset automatically:
that's maybe something that could be handled by Gregory's atfork
mechanism.
历史
日期 用户 动作 参数
2011-05-05 05:41:46neologix修改recipients: + neologix, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, bobbyi
2011-05-05 05:41:46neologix链接issue6721 messages
2011-05-05 05:41:46neologix创建