This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

作者 jonforums
收信人 alexis, eric.araujo, jonforums, rubenvb, schmir, tarek
日期 2011-07-27.21:38:18
SpamBayes Score 5.744888e-07
Marked as misclassified
Message-id <1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
内容
should the question be "what's the first mingw gcc version that -mno-cygwin usage unnecessary" rather than finding the first version the option was removed?

and, does it matter whether you're building on win for win, or cross compiling for win from nix?

sadly, i don't know gcc internals but a post to the mingw and/or mingw-w64 ml's should get the right people weighing in.

btw, can distutils do a lightweight configure-like check for feature presence rather than going a gcc version check?
历史
日期 用户 动作 参数
2011-07-27 21:38:19jonforums修改recipients: + jonforums, schmir, tarek, eric.araujo, rubenvb, alexis
2011-07-27 21:38:19jonforums修改messageid: <1311802699.08.0.520263963462.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-07-27 21:38:18jonforums链接issue12641 messages
2011-07-27 21:38:18jonforums创建