This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

作者 vinay.sajip
收信人 giampaolo.rodola, maker, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, vinay.sajip
日期 2012-05-15.16:25:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified
Message-id <1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
内容
> So if we add a map argument to that and only pass it to socket if it
> is non-None, wouldn't that maintain backward compatibility with
> current asyncore behavior?

Sorry I was being a bit dense ... it's been a while since I looked at this. I think you are right that the base create_socket could be changed in this way. I'll work up a patch in my sandbox branch (for easier Rietveld integration).
历史
日期 用户 动作 参数
2012-05-15 16:25:31vinay.sajip修改recipients: + vinay.sajip, terry.reedy, giampaolo.rodola, r.david.murray, maker
2012-05-15 16:25:31vinay.sajip修改messageid: <1337099131.25.0.703330115786.issue11959@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-15 16:25:30vinay.sajip链接issue11959 messages
2012-05-15 16:25:30vinay.sajip创建