消息 [162893]
Am 15.06.2012 14:21, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> I like the fact that a C implementation can be audited much more easily.
> Who knows what kind of effects the Python implementation can trigger, if
> some optimizations get added in the future.
Secondly we can predict the function's timing on other implementations
of Python. Jython or PyPy might have different settings for small int
caching -- or non at all.
> The point of supporting unicode would precisely be to avoid a
> unicode->bytes conversion when unicode strings are received.
A byte-wise comparison of the memory representation would work IFF both
sides have the same type and unicode kind. Anything else could give away
details of the content.
Either:
PyBytes_CheckExact(a) && PyBytes_CheckExact(b)
or
PyUnicode_CheckExact(a) && PyUnicode_CheckExact(b) && PyUnicode_KIND(a)
== PyUnicode_KIND(b)
I'm not sure about CheckExact, just being paranoid. |
|
| 日期 |
用户 |
动作 |
参数 |
| 2012-06-15 12:34:17 | christian.heimes | 修改 | recipients:
+ christian.heimes, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, fijall, python-dev, petri.lehtinen, hynek |
| 2012-06-15 12:34:17 | christian.heimes | 链接 | issue15061 messages |
| 2012-06-15 12:34:16 | christian.heimes | 创建 | |
|