➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

作者 alex.gronholm
收信人 ajoino, alex.gronholm, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, gvanrossum, iritkatriel, jab, njs, tinchester, yselivanov
日期 2022-02-18.10:57:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified 是
Message-id <1645181857.84.0.745336356573.issue46771@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
内容 
I am also uncomfortable using the cancel message to deliver the token/nonce/whatever.

If TaskGroup.cancel() is implemented, would it also deliver a cancellation in the parent task like trio and AnyIO do? It should IMHO, because otherwise if the task group is cancelled, it could still get stuck waiting on whatever the parent task happens to be waiting on, if it's not at TaskGroup.__aexit__() yet.
历史
日期 用户 动作 参数
2022-02-18 10:57:37alex.gronholm修改recipients: + alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, njs, jab, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, yselivanov, tinchester, iritkatriel, ajoino
2022-02-18 10:57:37alex.gronholm修改messageid: <1645181857.84.0.745336356573.issue46771@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-02-18 10:57:37alex.gronholm链接issue46771 messages
2022-02-18 10:57:37alex.gronholm创建