Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. AI-generated imagesEntirely or substantially AI-generated images are not eligible for featured picture status. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 21:04:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
Info all by me -- Espandero (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Espandero (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice. I quite like the purple tint, it seems to give the image a soft appealing mood. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautifully balanced composition, wonderful cloudscape and lovely interplay of shapes and lines. The shadow cast by the two figures on the left is a fascinating detail, resembling a large human head. Excellent work! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 18:28:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info This focused shot isolates the central fresco (the work of Jacopo Guarana, Ubaldo Gandolfi, and Serafino Barozzi) with exceptional clarity and high resolution. The image was taken before sunset (that is, before direct sunlight could illuminate the dome) using a high-resolution prime Canon EOS-M lens with an exposure time of 2 seconds at f/8. This approach ensured optimal optical detail and rich, natural colors, free from reflections; in doing so, it fills a significant documentation gap on Commons and probably, in my humble opinion, across the entire web, regarding the level of detail for this subject. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support as per nom's rationale. --JayCubby (talk) 21:55, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Great picture - I already thought this had FP potential when going through the WLM QI images. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 03:29, 4 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 15:52:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Cannaceae
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support There are only two featured pictures in this gallery, so I thought it was worth a try. And yes, I did take some photos in portrait mode, but they included other distracting parts of the plant as well as a large, ugly shadow. So, I went with this version instead. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Very lovely colours and excellent sharpness. --JackyM59 (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Lovely image! I think it could benefit from a little contrast adjustment. I've prepared a suggestion and uploaded it via SwissTransfer, entirely without obligation, in case you might consider using it for an updated upload. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, why not. I’ve adopted your version and uploaded it. Thanks. Petro Stelte (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm glad you found the adjustment useful and decided to adopt it. I think it works nicely with the colours and details of the flower. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Wonderful! — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:36, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 14:16:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Bangladesh
Info Chilli peppers surround labourers in the Bogura district in the north of Bangladesh. February 2020. Created by Azimronnie – uploaded by Azimronnie – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perhaps this can be a FP during Wikipedia Asian Month? -- Zquid (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Strong graphic composition with striking colours and a very good overhead perspective. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:39, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 13:53:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Armenia
Info Museum of Armenian script. Matenadaran, Yerevan, Armenia (Մատենադարանб, 2026). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 11:53:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Portugal
Info Aerial view of the historic Ribeira district alongside the Douro River in Porto, Portugal, featuring traditional terracotta tile roofs and the riverfront promenade. Photo taken from the upper tier of D. Luís Bridge. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose While this is a good-quality photograph documenting Porto’s historic Ribeira district, I find that it lacks the exceptional visual impact or distinctive photographic qualities I would expect from an FP. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is main problem here. Mile (talk) 14:19, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 10:40:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United Kingdom#Northern Ireland
Info Interesting calm landscape at Murlough Bay, County Antrim, Northern Ireland. Reminds The Cosmonaut's photos. We don't have a lot of FPs of Northern Ireland, so let's discuss this photo. Created by Salvatore Gerace – uploaded/nominated by me. Юрий Д.К. 10:40, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:40, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Superbe. --JackyM59 (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Very punchy/contrasty --JayCubby (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose
Overprocessed — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 09:53:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports including animals
Info created by Brien Aho – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- •Shawnqual•💭 10:12, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Vignetting is very distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Chris Woodrich unless changed — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 09:37:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
Info created by Grunpfnul – uploaded by Grunpfnul – nominated by Grunpfnul -- Grunpfnul (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Grunpfnul (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support nice light atmosphere --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:46, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment A stunning location with excellent light. The focus (f/1.4) is on the statue, at the expense of the gallery. It’s a choice... --JackyM59 (talk) 14:43, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Extreme corner shot with opened Aperture bring much CA around. Could be cleaned. --Mile (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The very shallow depth of field leaves most of the architectural setting out of focus. While the angel is sharply rendered, much of the surrounding architecture lacks sufficient sharpness. The use of a wide-open aperture (f/1.4, according to the Exif data) may have contributed to this, although the actual focusing distance is unknown. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 06:25:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
Info The Haus Weitmar was a manor built in the 12th/13th century in the form of a little moated castle. It was enlarged in the following centuries, but destroyed by bombs in World War II. In 2010, a new building, called Kubus, was erected in the ruins; it is used for exhibitions and cultural events. Created and uploaded by Rainer Halama – nominated me -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support The photograph beautifully illustrates how the contrast between historic and modern architecture has been harmonised. It is very well executed both technically and in terms of composition, and came 12th in the ‘Wiki Loves Monuments 2022’ competition. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support beautiful architecture contrast ... Building new and keeping old building --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:43, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support per IssamBarhoumi — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2026 at 03:35:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:35, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:35, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak support - I feel like the vignetting could be reduced and still have an emotional punch. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:59, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Info No vignetting applied in post. This is how the lighting (large softbox on an Aputure Light Storm 120D II) illuminated the object. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Info Good photo, but the shadows on the handle look too dark to me. --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- The heart and soul of this knife is the hand-forged blade. Nakagawa is one of the few blacksmiths who can forge Ginsan steel at this level and Ren is currently one of the most talked about sharpeners in Sakai. The traditional wa-handle of this gyūtō is more run-of-the-mill and shouldn't be the center of attention. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support I appreciate the simplicity and visual impact of this composition. The controlled lighting and the interplay of light and shadow give the image its distinctive character. The darker handle and the natural fall-off of illumination are, to my eye, deliberate and effective elements of the overall lighting concept. Having worked with analogue photography and studio setups during my vocational training in the printing industry, I know how much time and care goes into such arrangements. Having seen other photographs in this series, I particularly appreciate the craftsmanship behind this work. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:25, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 16:54:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Agaricaceae
Info A common puffball (Lycoperdon sp.) emitting spores. created by Lesmalvern – uploaded by Lesmalvern – nominated by Shawnqual -- •Shawnqual•💭 16:54, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- •Shawnqual•💭 16:54, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Strong oppose. Fake image. Puffball mushrooms are unable to "shoot" their spores upward on their own through any internal mechanisms or pressure. They require an external mechanical force to release their spores. A blow was likely struck to the back of the mushroom a fraction of a second before this shot was taken. Another reason is the mediocre quality of the image. Also the artificial lighting is too harsh (with light sources on both the left and right sides), and the white balance is wrong (there is an excessive purple/magenta cast on the ground). -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per George, it's a fake. Unlike many ascomycetes or some other basidiomycetes (which fire microscopic ‘ballistospores’), puffballs do not possess an active, cellular ejection mechanism. As this image completely misrepresents reality, this should at least be made clear in the description. It certainly has no educational value as it stands, even if the attempt to visually illustrate the species’ reproductive cycle was undoubtedly well-intentioned. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:43, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination •Shawnqual•💭 10:12, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Question - a little for curious... It appears, with high probability, that this image is fake and unacceptable for FP nomination. Lesmalvern appears to be anonymous, popping up just once 11 years ago in November of 2015 (pre-AI) to upload this one (we think fake) image with no descripton or technical information associated with it except for a Photoshop reference.
- However, time passes and this image is currently used on 19 wiki pages. What happens now? --GRDN711 (talk) 22:35, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Question This is a good question I'd also like to hear the answer to. Is there an established procedure for these situations? — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perhaps we could ask an experienced admin such as George for advice on how to proceed. Given the strong concerns about the image's authenticity and its use on 19 wiki pages, would a deletion discussion be appropriate? If the image is indeed misleading, it seems important to address this to prevent its continued and future use in articles. -- Radomianin (talk) 00:18, 4 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 13:33:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
Info created by Ahmed-slema11 – uploaded by Ahmed-slema11 – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 13:33, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 13:33, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose From a technical point of view, the dynamic range is far too high; the washed-out shadows and blown-out highlights are too extreme even for QI and cannot be rectified. Furthermore, there is no useful description of the image and the categorisation could be improved. Sorry, I can't support this image. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:50, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Featurable view, but I agree with Syntaxys. HDR may help here. Юрий Д.К. 09:42, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 11:23:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Grunpfnul – uploaded by Grunpfnul – nominated by Grunpfnul -- Grunpfnul (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Grunpfnul (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 12:28, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:06, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:19, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:24, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:57, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 09:33:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Amanitaceae
Info Orange-yellow fly agaric (Amanita muscaria var. aureola). All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:33, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:33, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support though I wish the bottom margin were larger. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:04, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:16, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support פעמי-עליון (talk) 18:06, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:06, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support per Chris --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:03, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Very precise work --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:52, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:24, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:35, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Jakubhal 08:27, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 07:53:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created & uploaded by Ermell – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment The dragon's head appears slightly OOF. Was it really underdetailed in real life, or...? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment I don't see this as a serious issue. Maybe the DOF wasn't quite enough.--Ermell (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks OK imho Юрий Д.К. 20:06, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nomination.--Ermell (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 05:36:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Sea dike at Koehool. view of the mudflats and the Wadden Sea at low tide. Rain coming. (Black-and-white photos aren’t very popular here, but I’m taking a chance because I find the patterns in the mudflats—which are more or less exposed as the tide has gone out—to be beautiful.)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support I do love me some mud flats. The B&W gives it a timeless quality; colour would instantly date it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support the Black and white is a good choice to highlight the mud flats --IssamBarhoumi (talk)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:58, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Generally speaking, I like it! But just imagine if you cropped out the foreground and displayed the image in 16:9 aspect ratio – wouldn’t that be an improvement (to more abstraction)? --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- @Syntaxys: Answer: Thank you for your positive response. I could potentially offer your idea as an alternative. What do you think?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2026 at 01:40:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Thailand
Info Sunset over Koh Larn, Thailand, viewed from the beach at Birds and Bees Resort in Pattaya, with pastel skies reflecting across the Gulf of Thailand. Created – uploaded & nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 01:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 01:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Trees don't add much, bathers take away (Maybe pointing a telephoto at them would scare them off...). Do you have a shot at beach level? --JayCubby (talk) 02:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2026 at 23:35:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Parlophone – uploaded by Kaiketsu – nominated by ★ -- ★ 23:35, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 23:35, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2026 at 15:10:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
Info created by Krabaa.anis – uploaded by Krabaa.anis – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Motif and detail quality (especially the lower part) is not convincing for me. The objects seems to lean slightly to the right, composition very simple and for me no FP level. Overall image too dark. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support It may be leaning but it is OK for old buildings. May be shot via a filter. Nice for me at all. Юрий Д.К. 20:02, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Tue, 10 Nov 2026 14:52:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Portraits, paintings of females
Info Autumn Flowers by Edouard Toudouze (1890) – André-Diligent Museum of Art and Industry, Roubaix My own work. --JackyM59 (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Slight reflection on the paint under the bonnet, but overall very nice. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:00, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2026 at 14:06:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
Info Panoramic view of Ajaccio, Corsica, taken aboard a cruise ship anchored in the port, c/u/n by --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 16:12, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Great light, motif and composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:56, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 12:55, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:16, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:38, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:31, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2026 at 10:45:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Tunisia
Info all by me-- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:20, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2026 (UTC)I'm sorry, but the timing was good, the main facade of the subject is in shadow. Otherwise I find the compo to static/boring with the subject in the center of the image. Poco a poco (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose- @Poco a poco I improved the Facade have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, it's better now, I'm moving to
Neutral. I'd have place the building further to the left in the compo. Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, it's better now, I'm moving to
Support פעמי-עליון (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Comment Please fix dust spot (noted). Юрий Д.К. 19:59, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
- ok I will fix it this evening and notify you. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 06:24, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- @ Юрий Д.К Done have alook please IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Zie opmerking spot.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- Oké, bedankt.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:07, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- I will fix it this evening and notify you. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- @Famberhorst done have a look please. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:18, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks much better and I glad that you've made the building brighter. Юрий Д.К. 13:18, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
- thank you for noticing the dust spot and helping to improve. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support after adding Exposure to subject. --Mile (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful soft qualities to the color and light — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:39, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Venus – 3D Perspective Views (delist)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2026 at 09:17:18
-
3D perspective view of Alpha Regio
-
3D perspective view of the western Estla Regio
-
3D perspective view of Sif and Gula Mons
-
3D perspective view of Maat Mons (first image)
-
3D perspective view of Maat Mons (second image)
-
3D perspective view of impact craters in Lavinia Planitia
-
3D perspective view of Latona Corona and Dali Chasma
-
3D perspective view of Sapas Mons
-
3D perspective view of domes in the eastern edge of Alpha Regio
Info 2 reasons to delist (Original nomination): 1) the nomination, including the first vote, was done by a user blocked due to sockpuppetry and the second vote was the sockpuppet influencing decisively the course of the nomination 2) none of the set criterias are fulfilled and therefore it cannot be considered a valid set, it's just a bunch of pictures from some areas on Venus. Poco a poco (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist Poco a poco (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist fully agreed with all reasons -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist per above --IamMM (talk) 09:57, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist I agree.--Ermell (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 10:08, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist MER-C 10:55, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist as per my comments on the original nomination and in the sockpuppet discussion on the FPC talk page; and per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Tue, 10 Nov 2026 02:19:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Rosaceae
Info My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 07:41, 01 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:53, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support though I'd have preferred more space at the bottom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:00, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 03:58, 4 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 21:55:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Gardens#Japan
Info Sogenchi Garden Tenryu-ji temple Kyoto Japan. It is the first site in Japan ever designated a Historic Site and Special Place of Scenic Beauty by the government.
created by – uploaded by – nominated by -- Don (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:56, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JayCubby (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 19:35:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:19, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:13, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:43, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:53, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:05, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tuxyso (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:57, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 19:19:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info The house is interesting because it combines two different styles—the ground floor is made of stone, and the first of brick. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - The shadows are pretty harsh. Lacks sharpness. Aesthetic appeal and wow factor are missing for me. -- E bailey (talk) 16:18, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- @E bailey: Thank you for your review. I've fixed the shadows and improved the sharpness. How does it look now? I cannot influence your opinion on the aesthetic appeal and the wow factor, but I think the lighting and the overall composition are appealing enough to compensate if they're missing. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- Noted. Agree your adjustments help with the shadows, but I still have concerns. I encourage others to vote and voice their opinions. -- E bailey (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- @E bailey: Thank you for your review. I've fixed the shadows and improved the sharpness. How does it look now? I cannot influence your opinion on the aesthetic appeal and the wow factor, but I think the lighting and the overall composition are appealing enough to compensate if they're missing. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:01, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 19:16:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Female singers
Info created by Justin Higuchi – uploaded by Tm – nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:16, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 19:16, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best composition for an FP of a famous artist. Would prefer tighter cropping on the subject. Lacks sharpness on the subject’s face. -- E bailey (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per E bailey — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:21, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 17:23:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:55, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:41, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:53, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 15:59, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC)*
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:01, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 15:59:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Philippines
Info created and uploaded by Aldous Mariano Cariño – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 18:58, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:24, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:38, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:53, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:56, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 07:12, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Question I am not familiar with drone shots, but I am wondering how the longer side could be higher than the maximum resolution of the drone which is 8064×6048 (see https://www.dji.com/de/mini-3/specs). Besides that the image description does not contain a panorama template I am not sure if you can do a pano shot with such a drone. What do the others think? --Tuxyso (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- Well, you gave specs on link, where is also written 180° which go as pano or vertorama. Since EXIF say Manual, maybe he do it on own, one side few shots, turn to other side and +few shot, and stich. For Exif used one of shots and done. Mile (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:41, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2026 at 07:53:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Armenia
Info Sourp Astvatsatsin (also Saint Araqelots church), Sevanank complex, Armenia -- Mile (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:40, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and contrast. --JackyM59 (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 07:10, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:34, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support פעמי-עליון (talk) 18:53, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:59, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:38, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on Mon, 09 Nov 2026 06:00:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info My own work. --iMahesh (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --iMahesh (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment Why did you decide to nominate only some of the sculptures?
- @Charlesjsharp: Last time I visited there was scaffolding behind the main gopura. I will revisit the place and capture it again. iMahesh (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 21:15:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info created & uploaded by Ermell – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment the CA is baked in thanks to the NR/processing. Could you defringe first? --JayCubby (talk) 21:51, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Done Tried to fix and hope it´s better. Thanks for the hint JayCubby.--Ermell (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Still some, but
Support JayCubby (talk) 23:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Still some, but
Support --Smailtn (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- E bailey (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:04, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:14, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:56, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support wow --Terragio67 (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 20:02:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info The New Palace (Neues Schloss), city of Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. It's a former residence of the Margraves of Brandenburg-Bayreuth. The single-wing complex was built in the Rococo style, beginning in 1753, under the commission of Frederick III and based on a design by Joseph Saint-Pierre. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm OK with the symmetrically obstructing trees. --JayCubby (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 08:10, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:42, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support. This image allows one to actually count tessellae. Jokes asides, the composition which neatly includes the trees is very pleasant to the eyes. Both treetops make me think of being heralds extending their hands towards a main act, the building in occurrence. Grand-Duc (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 01:59, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:31, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:55, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 18:38:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings/Germany#Berlin
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:43, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The perspective correction feels overly aggressive. The volumetric stretching in the smaller domes distorts the architecture too much for me. View these other photographs here and here to see what I’m referring to. -- E bailey (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- There is no aggressive perspective correction at all. I photographed it with a special architecture lens - please take look into the appropriate WP article to see how these lenses work. I went close to the building to get less distractions in the foreground and just shifted up. Pure optics :) —Tuxyso (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Then I don’t care for how this lens is being applied here. Distorts the architecture too much. Also, there’s no indication in your description data about your use of a tilt-shift lens. E bailey (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Categories are your friend :) Tuxyso (talk) 17:42, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Then I don’t care for how this lens is being applied here. Distorts the architecture too much. Also, there’s no indication in your description data about your use of a tilt-shift lens. E bailey (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- There is no aggressive perspective correction at all. I photographed it with a special architecture lens - please take look into the appropriate WP article to see how these lenses work. I went close to the building to get less distractions in the foreground and just shifted up. Pure optics :) —Tuxyso (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's overall too tight, the building needs space. Furthermore the illumination of the building and the lack of symmetry in the trees in front of it do not help much, either. Poco a poco (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, no shovel with me :) I personally like the cold-warm contrast with the illuminated trees. The crop is consiously tight to crop a very distracting light pole on the left. My idea here was to get full focus on the building. Tuxyso (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support OK for me. Юрий Д.К. 19:54, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support This depiction is technically sound from an architectural perspective, and I really like the contrasting colors created by the illumination. The trees aren't perfectly symmetrical, but that isn't something that could be fixed. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 18:26:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North_Caucasian_Federal_District
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment good compo, but some areas are overexposured. --Mile (talk) 08:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM: I tried to fix this by reducing the lighting in those areas. However, it’s worth noting that a smooth, snowy surface looks very similar to overexposed areas. -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- I tried some in color, no go. But in BW is more than fine. https:// flic.kr /p/2sKaQJ7 Mile (talk) 18:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM: I tried to fix this by reducing the lighting in those areas. However, it’s worth noting that a smooth, snowy surface looks very similar to overexposed areas. -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks pleasant to me, but you should improve the file name. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
- Filename changed for more relevant. -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support, though I agree about the file name. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:15, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
- Filename changed. -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Since the file has already been renamed, the nomination page title and all file references within the nomination now need to be updated accordingly. Otherwise, the bot may encounter problems. This is why file renaming should preferably be avoided while an FPC nomination is ongoing and postponed until the voting period has ended. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 17:36:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Polychaeta
Info The bobbit worm or sand striker (Eunice aphroditois) photo taken underwater in Maluku, Indonesia. created by Jenny Huang – uploaded by Flickr upload bot – nominated by Shawnqual -- •Shawnqual•💭 17:36, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- •Shawnqual•💭 17:36, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment Is the WB off? sandworm... --JayCubby (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Looks ok to me. •Shawnqual•💭 07:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- looks underexposed though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Looks ok to me. •Shawnqual•💭 07:55, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 15:31:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings/Germany#Berlin
Info Deutscher Dom in Berlin, 30 minutes before sunrise.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:10, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment - Seems to be some horizontal lean. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:51, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Done Thanks Chris Woodrich for your thorough review. Should be corrected now. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:20, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:44, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:51, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 12:30:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Tunisia
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Smailtn -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:09, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:21, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 12:15:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info Desert landscape in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, California. Created by John Desjarlais, uploaded/nominated by me.
Support Юрий Д.К. 12:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:50, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:25, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:56, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:15, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 12:12:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by NOIRLab – uploaded by Abdullah1099 – nominated by Abdullah1099 -- Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Info In this immense image NSF-DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory offers a brand new view of two old friends: the Trifid and Lagoon Nebulae. The image provides a demonstration of what makes Rubin unique: its combination of an extremely wide field of view and the speed that allows it to take lots of big images in a very short time. Combining images reveals subtle details in the clouds of gas and dust (labeled version here). The more images we can combine, the more detail we see! Abdullah1099 (talk) 12:13, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Amazing nebula, but it is FP already - File:Trifid and Lagoon nebulae.jpg Юрий Д.К. 13:11, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- No, That image is from Rubin Observatory website and this one is from NOIRLab. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 09:38:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Asteroideae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:55, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support I love photos that show natural decay.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:06, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks somehow like a painting. Nice light and colors. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:13, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:18, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 09:21:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- ~~
Support -- --Skander zarrad (talk) 09:21, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:09, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:07, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
File:Red Panda.JPG (delist)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2026 at 04:42:16
Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): Image is at 1,024 × 683 pixels, not considered a high resolution, but probably a medium resolution.
Delist -- The NMI User (talk) 04:42, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist Юрий Д.К. 13:08, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist --Mile (talk) 17:03, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist Poco a poco (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2026 at 15:10:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info all by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:20, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The side lighting doesn't work for me, sorry; the shadows are too harsh. In my opinion, File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg is an example of a well-done sidelit building, it is taken during the golden hour and the sun is partly obscured by clouds, giving a much softer quality to the light. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:11, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Your example is a really lovely image, but you’re comparing apples to oranges. I think this photograph here is very well executed, both in terms of composition and technique. It is precisely the side-lighting that lends the image depth and brings out the details in the textures so effectively. As a result, the photograph has great educational value and, in my opinion, is also the best in its main category. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- @Syntaxys thank you for the details you gave about the photo. in fact the duality light/ shadow here aims to show that the temple has 3 gates in that side. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:25, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @King of Hearts this duality light and shadow on the gates of the temple shows that there are three gates in the back of the temple when we entred in the archeologic site that day the gates where dark and when we are going out the sun showed up the gates. That is why I kept the duality. here a similar featured picture in Santorini that have this duality File:07-17-2012_-_Emborio_-_Emporio_-_Santorini_-_Greece_-_11.jpg IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
-- The NMI User (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above.
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @The NMI User this duality light and shadow on the gates of the temple shows that there are three gates in the back of the temple when we entred in the archeologic site that day the gates where dark and when we are going out the sun showed up the gates. That is why I kept the duality. here a similar featured picture in Santorini that have this duality File:07-17-2012_-_Emborio_-_Emporio_-_Santorini_-_Greece_-_11.jpg IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:27, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Smailtn (talk) 08:41, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Very well composed, good sharpness, no harsh light to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:47, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:59, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2026 at 07:52:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Does this picture seem three-dimensional and convex to you? Especially the blue? While the internet is filled with chaotic fractal renders, achieving a true, vivid 3D pop-out effect this is exceptionally rare. This volumetric illusion. We don't know how to do this. No one does. Out of hundreds renders, only a couple of files on the entire web to achieve this level lifelike volume. Fragment of the Mandelbrot set in description. Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Smailtn (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 30 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:06, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too many Mandelbrot Set images have already been featured --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support I didn't want to vote anymore, because I'm too fixated on the Mandelbrot set, but this image is really good! --Majow (talk) 11:08, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2026 at 07:51:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Arizona
Info created by M. Quinn – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support. An amazing shot taken with a smartphone -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:40, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Stunning. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 30 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:24, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:09, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 07:49, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Great lighting but sharpness isn't really good Poco a poco (talk) 09:24, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I find this image to be highly overprocessed. The small trees in the foreground (left) rock formation look painted because of the processing by the iPhone. It does have a wow factor with the overall light balance, but when viewed at full resolution it has “digital brushstrokes” all over the place to handle the noise and lack of sharpness. The clarity feels fake. -- E bailey (talk) 16:43, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per E bailey. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 20:38:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Painted_ceilings
Info Ceiling of the Kaisersaal, Würzburg Residence, Bavaria, Germany. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment You have strong CA on windows.--Mile (talk) 10:01, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
- CA
removed Poco a poco (talk) 21:37, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Poco a poco good, but you have to upoload that photo. I see just one "specimen". --Mile (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for the hint, Mile, now it's there. Poco a poco (talk) 19:35, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- CA
Support--Smailtn (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:26, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support ----Skander zarrad (talk) 09:31, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:53, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:18, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 17:22:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United_Kingdom
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aidowl -- Aidowl (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aidowl (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Smailtn (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:43, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:22, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The stained-glass window in the back is out of focus due to the f/5.6 aperture. While it's only by a little bit, I feel like for cathedral interiors, the building itself provides most of the "wow" factor so it's mostly down to execution, which needs to be perfect for FP IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- I get where you're coming from but I think for a shot of the nave of Wells the main subject is the famous scissor arch. IMO the window being less focused adds depth, separating the arch and its rood from the background. Aidowl (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
-- The NMI User (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above.
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 13:04, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose shallow DoF. --Mile (talk) 08:05, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Overall too dark to me, low detail of crucifix Poco a poco (talk) 10:08, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support I really like the unconventional composition distinguishing this photo from hundreds of other church indoor shots. Detail quality on the stainless glass window could be better but it is still OK. Also the crucifix is more than sharp enough imho. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:19, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Welcome to FPC, and thanks for sharing this lovely image! I really like the distinctive composition and the subtle, restrained lighting. However, the minor shortcomings in depth of field and sharpness keep me from giving a stronger vote. -- Radomianin (talk) 00:22, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support per Tuxyso --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Wonderful composition and scene — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 15:47:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#United_Kingdom
Info created by Martin Kraft – uploaded by Martin Kraft – nominated by Aidowl -- Aidowl (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aidowl (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support —--Skander zarrad (talk) 08:23, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:47, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support--Smailtn (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:44, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 02:42, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Impressive building, but the resolution is only 4.3 MP, and some windows are blown out; HDR should have been used here to manage the challenging lighting conditions. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 30 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above.
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Still very nice. Юрий Д.К. 13:02, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with KoH Poco a poco (talk) 08:52, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 12:28:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Artisans (craftspeople)
Info created by Rayhan Ahmed – uploaded by Rayhan Ahmed – nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition in interesting setting, depicting local craftspeople in a country that is not-so-popular in Featured Pictures. The quality is not perfect, but it is good enough, with no glaring technical faults. I wanted to nominate a photo from a Wiki Loves Folklore to offer encouragement to contributors. -- Tupungato (talk) 12:28, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:11, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment Quality may be OK, but we need more information for FPs: geolocation, village and district names, etc., and corresponding categories. Yann (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
- I established village and district names (added category), but I don't have specific geolocation.--Tupungato (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
- Then you can add the geolocation to the village. Yann (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
- I established village and district names (added category), but I don't have specific geolocation.--Tupungato (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
-- The NMI User (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 11:25:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by NOIRLab – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Abdullah1099 -- Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Info The 8.1-meter Gemini North telescope, located on the summit of Maunakea in Hawai‘i, has captured NGC 1514, nicknamed the Crystal Ball Nebula, in awe-inspiring detail. This nebula, with its mesmerizing glow of gas, harbors hints of a past stellar death, and its asymmetrical shell is now being shaped by the binary pair that lies at its center. Abdullah1099 (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment - This is awfully low resolution for an astronomy photograph. The file history suggests that higher resolutions are available somewhere. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to be the case, source says it is 2166 x 1662 px. This is quite low for a modern astronomical image. Impressive nevertheless. Yann (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah @Crisco 1492 @Yann, The image is not that high resolution for general astronomy feature picture candidates but the reason why i nominated the image is that the image is the top picture taken from International Gemini Observatory (IGO) by NOIRLab and second overall (First is File:Rosette Nebula Captured with DECam (noirlab2424a).jpg and is top picture taken from Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) by NOIRLab). This is part of my Category:Top 100 NOIRLab Images based on https://noirlab.edu/public/images/archive/top100/?nocache=true&, where i am trying to improve atleast some of these astronomical images taken by NOIRLab and nominate some of them as Featured pictures. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to be the case, source says it is 2166 x 1662 px. This is quite low for a modern astronomical image. Impressive nevertheless. Yann (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support It's unfortunate that a higher resolution isn't available, but it's a fantastic image nonetheless. --IamMM (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:40, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Yeah, that file history is weird, but the source does give the current resolution as the original (I suspect some sort of upsampling for their 4K wallpapers etc., which would be what OPBot uploaded). Great image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:33, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:29, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 08:52:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cettiidae_(Warblers)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:52, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:21, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:33, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:31, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 02:04, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Support The background is sufficiently out-of-focus to make the bird stand out, but we still see enough of the surroundings to get an impression of the bird’s habitat; this combination works very well here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2026 at 06:23:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Azulejos and painted tiles
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- ~~
Support -- --Skander zarrad (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:33, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:00, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 07:42, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful pattern. I take the liberty to propose another gallery link: there is a special, little-known FP gallery section for azulejos and painted tiles. – Aristeas (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 21:41:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The shadow is distracting - would be better on a cloudy day. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 30 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above.
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:34, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Comment This is an alternative version based on the reviews by King of Hearts and The NMI User. I was lucky that the weather conditions changed and took this image in a cloudy setting. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:15, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support as nominator. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support. Much better -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 12:59, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:38, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support, but there is chroma noise present in the shadows that could use correction — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 20:04:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info A woman going down a staircase in the Soares dos Reis National Museum, Porto, Portugal.
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:04, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 00:15, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:08, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I don't see any "Wow-effect" here. This photo is not about the woman, not about the museum, so, what is the photo about? Yes, it takes some skill and technical knowledge to take such photo, but also not outstanding with a digital camera. --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Difficult harsh light situation. It's not a bad photo. But it's missing something, either the lighting would have to be different, or the whole setting/situation more unique.--Tupungato (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Wes Anderson, David Lynch – that was my first thought … to me, there’s something Kafkaesque about this image. It feels like a hazy memory of a moment in a dream. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 09:44, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others.
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Yes, no clear subject but I like the light and compo here. Юрий Д.К. 12:59, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'd have gone for B&W but still, I agree with the opposing votes above Poco a poco (talk) 08:54, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support something elusive, a psychedelic impression from this shot -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:52, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per others --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Special to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:47, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Agree with Achim Lammerts and George Chernilevsky. – Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak support I like the unusual composition and dreamlike atmosphere, although the harsh light is somewhat distracting. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Radomianin. With some masking of that area and tweaking the highlights, this picture could be exceptional. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:35, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 18:43:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created by – uploaded by – nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:14, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:38, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 14:58:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Tunisia.with.my.eyes – uploaded by Tunisia.with.my.eyes – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:11, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 04:30, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Mosaic orthographic views of the Moon from LRO
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 05:11:11 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 0° longitude and 0° latitude
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 60° longitude and 0° latitude
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 120° longitude and 0° latitude
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 180° longitude and 0° latitude
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 240° longitude and 0° latitude
-
Mosaic orthographic view of the Moon is centered at 300° longitude and 0° latitude
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Earth's moon
Info created by NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by The NMI User -- The NMI User (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The NMI User (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive work. --JackyM59 (talk) 08:48, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:50, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:00, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I share Basile's concerns about the overly tight crop. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2026 at 02:18:50
Info Reason to delist (Original nomination): This picture was animated GIF.
Delist -- Beyond-X-U (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist Probably one of the animated GIF images (in Commons:Featured pictures/Animated).
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist --Yann (talk) 17:51, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist Юрий Д.К. 20:41, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Delist --Wilfredor (talk) 03:55, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Delist Poco a poco (talk) 09:27, 1 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2026 at 09:15:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Lycaenidae#Genus : Polyommatus
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:15, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:30, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:50, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Comment This photographer takes quite outstanding early morning images. I am disturbed by the background. Has it had major editing? Also, as I have commented before, there are many stacking errors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Krigore (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 04:26, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Oppose until concerns by Charlesjsharp are addressed. The stem vanishing is very distracting in my opinion. — Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:32, 3 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2026 at 06:02:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Netherlands
Info Ornament above the entrance gate on the exterior of the Vincentius Church in Roordahuizum. (coats of arms of church wardens Tjalling Homme van Kamstra, A. Everts, and G. Riemersma)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support tiny horizontal tilt on the right but it is fixable --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Note: thank you very much for your vote. You are likely referring to the slight horizontal misalignment of the window frame to the right, above the gateway featuring a coat of arms from 1726. This frame is part of the original church, which was built in the 15th century. The misalignment is a minor discrepancy between the old church structure and the later addition of the gateway. I have attempted to correct this, but I was unsuccessful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Ok The qualty of the file and its value are more important. Thank you IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:17, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
- Note: thank you very much for your vote. You are likely referring to the slight horizontal misalignment of the window frame to the right, above the gateway featuring a coat of arms from 1726. This frame is part of the original church, which was built in the 15th century. The misalignment is a minor discrepancy between the old church structure and the later addition of the gateway. I have attempted to correct this, but I was unsuccessful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:57, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --JackyM59 (talk) 12:55, 26 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:53, 30 October 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 04:25, 2 November 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2026 at 03:24:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 03:24, 26 October 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 03:24, 26 October 2026 (UTC)-- The NMI User (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2026 (UTC)
Support
- sockpuppet's voting -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:00, 31 October 2026 (UTC)
Support - Great colors! - Krigore (talk) 21:47, 28 October 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 30 Oct → Wed 04 Nov Sat 31 Oct → Thu 05 Nov Sun 01 Nov → Fri 06 Nov Mon 02 Nov → Sat 07 Nov Tue 03 Nov → Sun 08 Nov Wed 04 Nov → Mon 09 Nov
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 26 Oct → Wed 04 Nov Tue 27 Oct → Thu 05 Nov Wed 28 Oct → Fri 06 Nov Thu 29 Oct → Sat 07 Nov Fri 30 Oct → Sun 08 Nov Sat 31 Oct → Mon 09 Nov Sun 01 Nov → Tue 10 Nov Mon 02 Nov → Wed 11 Nov Tue 03 Nov → Thu 12 Nov Wed 04 Nov → Fri 13 Nov
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a
<noinclude>...</noinclude>section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:- A category for the month and year, like Category:November 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
- A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
- A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
- If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
