Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis

  • Published: December 1996
  • Volume 3, pages 422–433 (1996)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis
Download PDF
  • Meredyth Daneman1 &
  • Philip M. Merikle2 
  • 27k Accesses

  • 1242 Citations

  • 11 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This paper presents a meta-analysis of the data from 6,179 participants in 77 studies that investigated the association between working-memory capacity and language comprehension ability. A primary goal of the meta-analysis was to compare the predictive power of the measures of working memory developed by Daneman and Carpenter (1980) with the predictive power of other measures of working memory. The results of the meta-analysis support Daneman and Carpenter’s (1980) claim that measures that tap the combined processing and storage capacity of working memory (e.g., reading span, listening span) are better predictors of comprehension than are measures that tap only the storage capacity (e.g., word span, digit span). The meta-analysis also showed that math process plus storage measures of working memory are good predictors of comprehension. Thus, the superior predictive power of the process plus storage measures is not limited to measures that involve the manipulation of words and sentences.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Working Memory and English Language Learning: Implications for Classroom-Based Research

Chapter © 2024

Memory from nonsense syllables to novels: A survey of retention

Article Open access 07 May 2024

Working Memory and Morphosyntax in Children with Specific (Primary) Language Impairment

Chapter © 2017

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognition
  • Language Processing
  • Working Memory
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Metacognition
  • Memory Studies

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Working memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,302, 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A.[D.], Logie, R.[H.], Nimmo-Smith, I., &Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. (1985). Working memory and comprehension: A replication.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., &Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement.Cognitive Psychology,23, 45–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, M. (1993). Adult age differences in the ability to write prose passages.Educational Gerontology,19, 375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, M. G., Ramos, P. M., &Estevez, A. (1992). Test anxiety and comprehension efficiency: The role of prior knowledge and working memory deficits.Anxiety, Stress, & Coping,5, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, J., Engle, R. W., &Hamilton, G. (1991). Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate?Intelligence,15, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariglia-Bull, T., &Pressley, M. (1990). Short-term memory differences between children predict imagery effects when sentences are read.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,49, 384–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1075–1122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H.-C. (1986). Effects of reading span and textual coherence on rapid-sequential reading.Memory & Cognition,14, 202–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, K. E., &Park, D. C. (1993). Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults.Psychology & Aging,8, 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson-Smith, L., &Hartley, A. A. (1990). The game of bridge as an exercise in working memory and reasoning.Journals of Gerontology,45, P233-P238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1982). The measurement of reading comprehension: How not to trade construct validity for predictive power.Intelligence,6, 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1987). Reading and working memory. In J. Beech & A. Colley (Eds.),Cognitive approaches to reading (pp. 57–86). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1988a). How reading braille is both like and unlike reading print.Memory & Cognition,16, 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1988b). Word knowledge and reading skill. In M. Daneman, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 145–175). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M. (1991). Working memory as a predictor of verbal fluency.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,20, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., &Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M.,Nemeth, S.,Stainton, M., &Huelsmann, K. (in press). Working memory as a predictor of reading achievement in orally educated hearing-impaired children.Volta Review.

  • Daneman, M., &Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII (pp. 491–508). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das-Smaal, E. A., De Jong, P. F., &Koopmans, J. R. (1993). Working memory, attentional regulation, and the star counting test.Personality & Individual Differences,14, 815–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1985). Short-term memory development in childhood and adolescence. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.),Basic processes in memory development: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 209–248). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., LeFevre, J., &Twilley, L. C. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill.Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drevenstedt, J., &Bellezza, F. S. (1993). Memory for selfgenerated narration in the elderly.Psychology & Aging,8, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., &Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 972–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Carullo, J. J., &Collins, K. W. (1991). Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions.Journal of Educational Research,84, 253–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Nations, J. K., &Cantor, J. (1990). Is “working memory capacity” just another name for word knowledge?Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 799–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnham-Diggory, S., &Gregg, L. W. (1975). Short-term memory function in young readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,19, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisk, V., &Milner, B. (1990). The relationship of working memory to the immediate recall of stories following unilateral temporal or frontal lobectomy.Neuropsychologia,28, 121–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., &Baddeley, A. D. (1993).Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, C. A., &Campbell, T. F. (1994). Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data.Perceptual & Motor Skills,79, 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenggi, D., &Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Processing components of college-level reading comprehension.Discourse Processes,17, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1986). Reader and text variables as determinants of discourse memory in adulthood.Psychology & Aging,1, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1988). Aging and individual differences in memory for written discourse. In L. L. Light & D. M. Burke (Eds.),Language, memory, and aging (pp. 36–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., &Olkin, I. (1985).Statistical methods for metaanalysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M., &Tate, C. S. (1992). Direct and indirect assessments of memory for script-based narratives in young and older adults.Cognitive Development,7, 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C. A., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1990). Autobiographical and text recall in the elderly: An investigation of a processing resource deficit.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 441–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. (1980). Intelligence as an information-processing concept.British Journal of Psychology,71, 449–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hupert, M., Nef, F., &Maroy, M. (1992). Étude comparative du langage spontané d’adultes jeunes et agés.L’Année Psychologique,92, 511–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. D., &McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurden, F. H. (1995). Individual differences in working memory and complex cognition.Journal of Educational Psychology,87, 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurden, F. H., &Reese, H. W. (1992). Educational context differences in prose recall in adulthood.Journal of Genetic Psychology,153, 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,4, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, J., &Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 580–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W., &van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension.Psychological Review,85, 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C. (1993). Aptitude testing inspired by information processing: A test of the four-sources model.Journal of General Psychology,120, 375–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Pointe, L. B., &Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1118–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather, C. V., &Henry, L. A. (1994). Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,58, 88–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Sammons, W. H., &Whitney, P. (1991). Reading perspectives and memory for text: An individual differences analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1074–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Guckenberg, T., &Lee, O. (1988). Comparative study of cognitive consequences of inquiry-based logo instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology,80, 543–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., &Littlefield, J. (1993). Relationships among cognitive components in logo learning and transfer.Journal of Educational Psychology,85, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, L. L., &Anderson, P. A. (1985). Working-memory capacity, age, and memory for discourse.Journal of Gerontology,40, 737–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. [H.], Baddeley, A. D., Mané, A. M., Donchin, E., &Sheptak, R. (1989). Working memory in the acquisition of complex cognitive skills.Acta Psychologica,71, 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logie, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J., &Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving.Memory & Cognition,22, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyxell, B., &Rönnberg, J. (1993). The effects of background noise and working memory capacity on speechreading performance.Scandinavian Audiology,22, 67–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J., &Miller, J. A. (1983). Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text.Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., &Pribram, K. H. (1960).Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. C. (1982).The process of reading: A cognitive analysis of f luent reading and learning to read. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D. G., Leirer, V. O., &Altieri, P. A. (1992). Aging, expertise, and narrative processing.Psychology & Aging,7, 376–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, S., Kemper, S., &Kynette, D. (1992). Adults’ reading comprehension: Effects of syntactic complexity and working memory.Journals of Gerontology,47, P258-P265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., &Goldman, S. R. (1976). Discourse memory and reading comprehension skill.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., &Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., Boyes, C., Robins, S., &Manchester, J. (1989). Telling tales: Aging, working memory, and the narrative cohesion of story retellings.Developmental Psychology,25, 628–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radvansky, G. A., Gerard, L. D., Zacks, R. T., &Hasher, L. (1990). Younger and older adults’ use of mental models as representations for text materials.Psychology & Aging,5, 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, J. L. (1993). Information-processing differences of collegeage readers differing in reading comprehension and speed.Journal of Reading Behavior,25, 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, N. D. (1939). Studies in visual and auditory memory span with special reference to reading disability.Journal of Experimental Education,8, 208–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnberg, J., Arlinger, S., Lyxell, B., &Kinnefors, C. (1989). Visual evoked potentials: Relative to adult speechreading and cognitive functions.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,32, 725–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., &Babcock, R. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory.Developmental Psychology,27, 763–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., &Kersten, A. W. (1993). Decomposing adult age differences in symbol arithmetic.Memory & Cognition,21, 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T. A., Mitchell, D. R. D., Skovronek, E., &Babcock, R. L. (1989). Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P., &Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills?Journal of Educational Computing Research,7, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., &Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes.Memory & Cognition,20, 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things.American Journal of Psychology,15, 72–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staver, J. R., &Jacks, T. (1988). The influence of cognitive reasoning level, cognitive restructuring ability, disembedding ability, working memory capacity, and prior knowledge on students’ performance on balancing equations by inspection.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25, 763–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stine, E. A. L., Lachman, M. E., &Wingfield, A. (1993). The roles of perceived and actual control in memory for spoken language.Educational Gerontology,19, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stine, E. [A.] L., &Wingfield, A. (1987). Process and strategy in memory for speech among younger and older adults.Psychology & Aging,2, 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stine, E. A. L., Wingfield, A., &Myers, S. D. (1990). Age differences in processing information from television news: The effects of bisensory augmentation.Journals of Gerontology,45, P1-P8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1992). Generality and modifiability of working memory among skilled and less skilled readers.Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1993). Working memory in learning disability subgroups.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,56, 87–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L., Cochran, K. F., &Ewers, C. A. (1989). Working memory in skilled and less skilled readers.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,17, 145–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. L., Yesavage, J. A., Morrow, D. G., Dolhert, N., Brooks, J. O., &Poon, L. W. (1994). The effects of information load and speech rate on younger and older aircraft pilots’ ability to execute simulated air-traffic controller instructions.Journals of Gerontology,49, P191-P200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tirre, W. C., &Pena, C. M. (1992). Investigation of functional working memory in the reading span test.Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 462–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, C. A., Bloise, C. G. R., Timko, M. L., &Baumgaertner, A. (1994). Working memory and inference revision in brain-damaged and normally aging adults.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,37, 896–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tun, P. A., Wingfield, A., &Stine, E. A. L. (1991). Speechprocessing capacity in young and older adults: A dual-task study.Psychology & Aging,6, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J., &Aberdeen, J. S. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age?Experimental Aging Research,14, 103–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, L5L 1C6, Mississauga, ON, Canada

    Meredyth Daneman

  2. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    Philip M. Merikle

Authors
  1. Meredyth Daneman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip M. Merikle
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredyth Daneman.

Additional information

This research was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to M. Daneman and P. M. Merikle. We thank Monica Davidson for her help with data search and categorization, Lee Sechrest for statistical consultation, and Akira Miyake for his useful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daneman, M., Merikle, P.M. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 422–433 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546

Download citation

  • Received: 01 September 1995

  • Accepted: 06 June 1996

  • Issue date: December 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Digit Span
  • Language Comprehension
  • Verbal Process
  • Storage Resource
  • Reading Span

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.243.58

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature