FanGraphs Baseball

The 2026 Pitching Superlatives, Part 3: Location

Katie Stratman and Patrick Gorski-Imagn Images

Welcome to day three of our pitching superlatives series. In part one we talked about velocity, and in part 2 we talked about movement. Today we’re talking about location, and I have to tell you, location is a weird topic in today’s game. First, the strike zone shrank. The strike zone has actually been shrinking for a while now, but due to the implementation of the ABS challenge system, it also shrank more quickly just this year.

Second, over the past several years, pitchers have gotten so good that teams spend a lot of time trying to convince them to just trust their stuff and rip it right down the middle. You might recall that the Angels went so far as to have their pitchers stand in as batters against the Traject Ark’s version of their own stuff, just to remind them of how nasty they were. In some ways, you could argue that command has never mattered less than it does right now. That doesn’t mean that location doesn’t matter at all. I’m sure you’ve seen it before, but here’s the diagram that shows Statcast’s Attack Zones.

In 2026, if you threw a pitch right down the middle (in Zone 5, you were 69% more likely to give up a home run than if you threw it elsewhere in the strike zone. That’s why 23% of home runs were hit on middle-middle pitches even though just 7% of pitches were middle-middle. Location may matter less, but people will still tell you that home runs are thrown, not hit, and they’re right. Read the rest of this entry »


Hey, Where Did All the Runs Go?

Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images

First and foremost, I’ll remember the 2026 postseason as a triumph for the Milwaukee Brewers. They romped through October with both the best offense and the best pitching staff in the field, outscoring their opponents by a whopping two runs per game. The best team in baseball did best-team-in-baseball things, in other words. But I’ll also remember the 2026 postseason for its stifling lack of offense, and for the pitchers who caused that brownout. The playoffs are always a low-scoring environment, with every baserunner and out contested. But this year, hitters were particularly helpless. Teams scored just 3.56 runs per game in postseason play, a strikingly tiny number.

And this wasn’t the result of one or two teams running out of gas in October. If you use the regular season’s .314 overall wOBA as a barometer, only the Brewers managed average or better offense in the playoffs:

2026 Playoff Offenses, Sortable
Team AVG OBP SLG BB% K% ISO BABIP wOBA R/G Games
Brewers .262 .346 .396 10.1% 21.7% .133 .320 .328 4.54 13
Yankees .238 .299 .381 8.4% 25.3% .144 .288 .298 4.60 5
Padres .230 .305 .346 8.4% 21.0% .115 .270 .293 3.67 6
Guardians .224 .313 .336 10.6% 20.0% .112 .271 .291 3.73 11
Phillies .231 .270 .394 3.6% 22.5% .163 .273 .288 3.00 3
White Sox .211 .316 .295 10.9% 36.0% .084 .338 .283 4.00 7
Braves .183 .294 .315 11.6% 24.4% .132 .225 .274 3.14 7
Dodgers .195 .267 .323 8.7% 23.6% .128 .225 .264 3.12 8
Rays .214 .269 .315 5.6% 21.3% .101 .260 .262 3.36 14
Astros .169 .229 .354 4.2% 31.0% .185 .179 .257 3.00 2
Cubs .129 .229 .145 10.0% 27.1% .016 .186 .187 0.50 2
Red Sox .117 .159 .250 4.8% 30.2% .133 .128 .181 1.00 2

I threw a smorgasbord of offensive statistics in that table so that you could see all the different ways that teams struggled. The obvious takeaway? The postseason hardly looked like the regular season:

2026 League Offense, Postseason vs. Regular Season
Team AVG OBP SLG BB% K% ISO wOBA Runs/Game
Reg Season .244 .318 .400 8.9% 22.1% .156 .316 4.48
Postseason .217 .295 .336 8.7% 23.9% .119 .282 3.56

It wasn’t due to a surge in strikeouts, or a decline in walks. Rather, it was that when offenses put the ball in play, they got very little for it. Balls rarely landed for hits, and hitters’ power vanished. The combination of great pitching and great defense was just too much for the put-it-in-play ethos of many of this fall’s teams. Read the rest of this entry »


The 2026 Pitching Superlatives, Part 2: Movement

Brad Penner and Jay Biggerstaff-Imagn Images

Welcome to part two of our pitching superlatives series. I’ll be here all week covering the pitches that stick out the most. Yesterday, I discussed the pitches that stood out the most due to their velocity. Today, we’re talking about movement, but before we get into it, I need to issue a correction.

Yesterday, I credited James McCann with throwing the slowest individual pitch of 2026, but it has been pointed out to me that McCann only threw the slowest tracked pitch of 2026. Twenty-one times, a position player threw a pitch so funky that Statcast threw up its electronic shoulders and assigned it a velocity of “–”. Often, it did so because the pitch was so slow that the cameras didn’t know what to make of it, or perhaps (just a theory) because the slowness of the pitch forced the pitcher to throw such a high-arcing rainbow that it was out of the path where Statcast expects to find pitches. I mean, what are you supposed to do with this pitch?

Either way, it’s possible that McCann’s pitch was, at worst, the 22nd-slowest pitch of the season. However, McCann still threw a plurality of those 21 untracked position player pitches, which means that he’s still most likely the person who threw the slowest pitch of the entire season. It just might not be the one we highlighted yesterday. Could it be this preposterous offering? We’ll never know. Read the rest of this entry »


Brendan Gawlowski Prospects Chat 11/3/2026

Hello everybody. Lighter queue today so far, guess that means it's the offseason. We'll see if it picks or if we have a shorter one today.

How much has Zion Rose juiced his stock in Arizona?

For us? Enough to go from where we had him in the draft to somewhere on our T100.

which prospects have elicited the loudest uncontrolled reaction from you? shock, awe, dismay, hilarity?

I'm relatively even keeled but I did just start laughing when Yanquiel Fernandez hit a fly ball 47 feet over the foul pole, an ump called it foul, and then he hit one even further out to right center on the next pitch.

And also when Modesto broke an eighth inning, 0-0 deadlock when a wild pitch bounced off a catcher's shin guard and into the dugout and allowed the only run of the game to score.

And when Juan Guerrero started playing hackey sack with his glove in left field as his pitcher came set.

I'm an 880ish rating. Is that Rookie Ball?

That's probably 60th percentile or so on Chess.com? Sounds pretty good to me.

You mentioned somewhere (I think) that the Red Sox list was to be released earlier this offseason. Usually it’s a little later. Is this change due to feedback or something else? Either way, I’m looking forward to it

Nope, just picked it out of a hat. Metaphorically, at least.

Would you rather have a lineup of 9 Chandler Simpsons or 9 Yandys?

Would be fascinating to see the 9 Simpsons play the 9 Yandys. Think I'm team Yandy but what a mess of a game that would be.

Is Angel Genao just blocked all across the infield to the point the Guards try him in LF, or is the bat just not playable there?

I would view his situation as more of a temporary obstacle than something where you need to consider switching his position. Could be a trade chip, could be a Rocchio replacement, could be a second baseman and you move Bazzana.

Brewers LHP Wande Torres threw the 3rd most MiLB innings in their org this season. Do you think he profiles as a starter long term?

Not out of the question but he's not very loose/fluid and he's already walking a fair few hitters. 80/20, 90/10 relief outcome.

What's one scout friendly change to the CBA that you'd like to see happen? (I know they're not at the table, but a change where one of the consequences is more human intelligence.)

Pushing the draft back to June.

To the user who keeps asking whether Players from Country Y are motivated and those from Country Z lazy: I'm not publishing that for what I assume are obvious reasons.

Awesome stuff, struggled with command seems to be Jarlin Susana's AFL report on repeat… how does an organization forecast development with a prospect like that?

They'll be kicking around various paths forward. Coaches and dev staff will have ideas on what they want him to do physically and how likely it is that change X can facilitate outcome Y (better command in this case).

In Susana's particular case, that will likely involve a tailored plan for the winter (workout regimen, throwing program, etc.)

And then an assessment of where he's at come spring training

Would Bazzana’s bat play anywhere but 2B? Seems like a “good, not great” player if he makes it long term at 2B, but does he hit enough (or field enough) for anywhere else on the dirt?

If he's a ~110 wRC+ bat over the long haul, that could play in a corner. I'm not saying "move Bazzana," more "I don't think you'll see Genao move to LF, here are a few ways he could get in the lineup without doing that."

Not a prospect but from an evaluation standpoint which role do you think Grant Taylor is best suited for: starter, closer or Andy Ashby?

I think he can start, and given Chicago's rotation situation, it makes sense to give him a shot. The other two are nice fallback options.

If anything, what under the radar things are taking place in player development systems?

I think if you're here and subscribed to FG, you're probably pretty plugged in and aware of a lot of the things going on. Holistic athletic assessments, tailored and increasingly sophisticated strength and conditioning training, bat handle/barrel shape experimentation, pitch design labs…

You, understandably, wrote up Po-Chun Lin as a total wild card on the Mariners list last offseason. Any updated info on him now that he's pitched on the CPX?

Please check back next week, I don't have a great answer for you this very second and complex stuff requires a little more legwork than I can do with a chat going on.

What strengths can a farm director bring to a major league clubhouse?

People management. Farm directors have to get so many different types of people and personalities (coaches, players, trainers; new school and old school; native English speakers and people still learning; front office folks; etc.) motivated and swimming in the same direction. It's a different challenge than managing a team of major leaguers and handling the media and whatnot, but if you're good at people management, I can buy that that skill could translate to a managerial setting.

When do you expect list season to kick off? I check twelve times a day for the updated Braves list : )

Hopefully next week. But sounds like you could use a second sneak peak.

Luis Guanipa: Guanipa was a $2.5 million international signee out of Venezuela in the 2023 class. Despite the bonus, the 20-year-old is neither especially toolsy nor projectable, and the contours to his profile are similar to what they were a year ago. He makes a lot of contact (77% overall, 84% in zone last year) but it’s not especially authoritative. He tends to swing inside the ball and generates a lot of opposite field contact. Guanipa has average bat speed and is only able to consistently pull offspeed pitches that hang over the middle or inner part of the plate. His approach and swing decisions are generally solid but he started chasing more spin off the plate this past year and hardly walked at all after a late-season promotion to High-A.

Defensively, Guanipa’s tape is a mixed bag, with a blend of good reads off the bat and drifty routes that sometimes get him in trouble. He has the look of a guy who can play but not excel in center, and if anything he looks a half step slower than he did at last check in. There’s still enough hit skill and defensive versatility for him to grow into a fourth outfielder role, but some of the strongest parts of his game look a little dicier than they did in the low minors, and he’s correspondingly fallen a bit in this year’s update.

What are your “if the lockout lasts too long here’s what I can write about” article ideas?

Eric and I are not going to struggle for content.

In an ideal world where all lists are published and there's no MLB, we've still got the minors, foreign leagues, colleges, etc. to follow. And I'd love to do more PD/scouting articles like the one I had last month about pro scouting.

Not a prospect question, but I keep reading about how the Brewers are good at bat design. Can you explain that to us, and particularly, why other teams can't copy it? I always think objective analysis is a lot easier to agree on than the more subjective analysis that so much of scouting is built on.

I have no idea how good they are at it relative to anybody else but they're not alone in experimenting here. I can't find it but I thought I read something a couple years back about Julio trying various bat handles and actually not choosing the one that led to the very highest max EV because he didn't like the way it felt? Is that out there somewhere?

What do you think is the biggest jump or fall a player has ever taken in an evaluation cycle? Have you ever bumped a 35+ to a 55+ in one season? Or the reverse?

Better question for Eric, since he's been doing this forever… Plenty of really young guys will go from off the radar to the 40+ category in any given year. Breyner Figuereo with Texas just might end up in that territory.

Conversely, there are a few guys who got money in the DSL who start as 40/40+ types that just aren't good. Kendry Martinez, Cristopher Polanco, etc.

When it comes to the draft, are there prospects that you like who are likely to fail because of the team that drafted them? Can you name any situations in the past when you were upset for the player because of the team that drafted them?

Of course. We try to comment when we think a player goes to a particularly good spot for their talents or vice versa.

Too pithy to say "every time Colorado drafts a pitcher" but not by much.

I mean, the Brewers were very involved in the most famous "bat design" incident (?) in recent baseball history: last year's "torpedo bat" opening weekend controversy.

Came from the Yankees, but yes good example

Since you mentioned at the outset that the queue was a little lighter, can you take us behind the scenes of one of your chats? Are you cross referencing notes with stat pages with video, etc., or is it as simple as the questions come in, you pick one and type an answer and move on?

Sure. First though, you guys have picked up the pace in a big way, tons of stuff in there now. But it's pretty simple, I see all the questions that have been asked, I try to select mostly ones I can answer relatively quickly but I also have my spreadsheets open and will watch a little video if there's a guy I'm familiar with but need a refresh or a new look. The Wande Torres question, for example, I pulled some video of him and had that in the b/g for a few minute while I took other q's. If there's something interesting that I'm unprepared for, I'll ask folks to come back the next week and try to do a little research for them between now and then.

I've also heard some feedback that my answers can be terse; I don't mean them to be, I just wanna answer more rather than less.

Are there any pitchers you or Eric have discussed hundo'ing based alone off pitch shapes or traits without the requisite sample size or game performance

Discuss, maybe, but we generally want to see guys throw a little bit before we go nuts. Briggs McKenzie is a good example. We like him, I'd put a mid-rotation grade on him if I were scouting for a team… for the 100, let's see him hold his stuff over longer stretches first.

Are there any prospect types that are benefiting from the consolidation of the minor leagues?

The handful of guys that are boat racing through are perhaps getting to the big leagues faster than they would have in the old days of ten years ago.

Caminiti has seemed poised for a breakout for a couple years now, is he someone who gets a long runway to develop a viable offspeed? If the change doesn't come around, is there still enough stuff to 50 him?

CH looks better year over year. He's one we have to talk through but I think he makes it.

Any surprise 50s for the Red Sox list? How close are Godbout, Primera, Delzine?

Delzine may just sneak on there. Primera PTC I think, Godbout I'm a little down on relative to last May.

>Bud Smith 11:40 AM What do you think is the biggest jump or fall a player has ever taken in an evaluation cycle? Have you ever bumped a 35+ to a 55+ in one season? Or the reverse?

iirc Vance Honeycutt went from 2025 45 FV to 2026 HM

(checks board) and now he's back to 40 FV!

There are probably even more dramatic movers out there, too.

How do you see the white sox handling Smith/Schultz/McDougal next year? Rotation? Bullpen? AAA?

Just speculation, but Schultz gets every chance to start, Smith is the relief ace, McDougal less of a factor.

Sebastian Walcott offense showing up in AFL stat line. If he makes it to the majors in 2027, what defensive position(s) would you expect to see? And what is a reasonable guess for how much shortstop he plays in his career ahead: more or less than 450 innings of major league shortstop?

That's a fun over/under. I'll take the over, because that's not really all that many games. That said, if/when he makes it in 2027, I would guess it's in the outfield just b/c Seager is still around and productive.

Do you think there is any chance a version of the Rule 5 draft takes place at some point this offseason? If the likelihood is low will it materially impact team's 40-man roster decisions over the next two weeks?

Chance, sure, doesn't seem likely. Team behavior would change if they knew one way or the other.

How does the MiLB ball vs the MLB ball impact your evaluation of pitchers? Do all pitchers lose x% of their stuff, or does it only affect certain types of pitchers? On a related note, is Jacob Odle a Dude?

Good question. Does not seem to effect all pitchers evenly, seems to effect the overhand/carrying fastball guys more than others but need to do more work to tell if that's anecdotal or a trend.

Is Arias Gleyber Torres with better defense or is that just me?

That comp doesn't light me up.

But, if he posts a 113 wRC+ over his first nine years like Torres did, he's a star.

Any chance Bodine or Gillen debut in 2027?

Good chance, particularly for Bodine, who's already in Triple-A.

Will there be any fringy free agents that jump the gun and sign overseas just to avoid hits to development time?

Speculation, obviously, but I'd buy that the uncertainty could push guys on the fence to take the leap. Maybe a few more Dan Straily types available for KBO clubs this year.

What do you make of Bishop Letson after the way he finished his season?

Let's pull up the game logs here…. oh damn, that was pretty good: https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=l…

I don't have any strong opinions off the cuff, it's the kind of thing that will have me looking for changes between September and July.

But also, guys do this. I bought BIG on Case Williams throwing harder and missing a ton of bats down the stretch in 2022. Next spring, the velo uptick was gone and he was Case Williams again.

Listening to you on There R Giants right now. How many other orgs are lucky enough to have someone covering their farm system so comprehensively?

Roger does a really good job, he's plugged in and is on top of all sorts of stuff. You and I hear a rustle in the wind, he hears that Samir Chires is throwing harder in a bullpen session.

I don't want to miss anyone, so forgive errors of omission, but obviously Sox Prospects do a great job with Boston. Scott Lucas covers Texas and is a friend I've run into countless times on the backfields. Matt Winkelman on the Phillies. There are others, again, forgive my scrambled brain right now.

MadFriars

How do you think about choice between having the multi-inning super reliever vs keep trying them at a starting (Aaron Ashby)? To phrase it differently, when do you just accept that you have a stud reliever who can cover multiple innings?

If every start seems to start well and then turn into a quagmire around the third or fourth, you've got a good candidate.

What franchises would you anticipate most aggressively gambling that the Rule V draft doesn't take place?

Franchises should not be gambling, it's against the rules.

(More rooting than gambling, I'd imagine. Teams with deep systems, a crowded 40, and a ton of guys eligible for the R5. TB/MIL/SF come to mind)

Looking at stuff, build, projection, delivery, athleticism, command, compete, holding velo, age x level, everything, am I crazy for thinking Zazueta is the best RHP prospect the Dodgers have had in like 20 years?

He's up there. The tricky part is that we have the benefit of hindsight on a few good ones that haven't worked out. Like, Bobby Miller was a very good prospect, River Ryan we're obviously high on still, etc.

re: Case Williams and velo jumps, Landon Knack hitting a hundo in spring training feels like a lifetime ago now

Maybe the prospect with the widest range of radar readings I've encountered from the first to second time I saw him

A good reminder that, while you can't/shouldn't ignore the gun, you shouldn't chase it either.

Re: Grant Taylor- James has written a few times that Brian Bannister has, when talking about Taylor, brought up how his extreme extension is similar to Glasnow, and seemed to imply that it may lead to similar injury concerns with a starter's workload (especially on shoulder/lat which he's already had trouble with). Is this a concern you share, both for Taylor specifically and more generally as a potential issue for high-extension pitchers?

Bannister on Taylor: Guys that pitch at max extension are kind of in that danger zone…

"There's just an added level of stress involved versus somebody who pitches more in the range of their physical height. If they have six-five extension and they're six-five, I think everything is operating in more of a middle, neutral range of the bell curve. It's just an observation and I do a ton of studies on my own, because a lot of this you have to operate in theory because there's not huge sample sizes. Like [Tyler] Glasnow [who has similarly high extension], when you look at the track record of innings pitched — and I have a lot of respect for him and his talent — there's a lot of seasons where he threw like, 60 innings. There's just not an extended track record of throwing 100-200 innings."

Great question, I have no answer, but something interesting to think about. Might ask around this winter and see if there's an article there somewhere…

Think I'm going to shut it down here. Thanks for coming as always and we'll do it again next week. In the meantime, be well.


Dusty Baker and Bruce Bochy Headline the Strongest Contemporary Era Ballot in Recent Memory

RVR Photos-USA TODAY Sports, Stan Szeto-USA TODAY Sports

Induction Day in Cooperstown next summer could be a Giant affair, or at least have a very Bay Area-oriented theme. On Monday, the Hall of Fame announced its slate of eight candidates for the 2027 Contemporary Baseball Managers/Umpires/Executives ballot, dedicated to non-player candidates who made their greatest impact from 1980 to the present. The group is headlined by a pair of first-time eligible managers with ties to San Francisco, namely Dusty Baker and Bruce Bochy, plus the general manager who oversaw their most successful seasons in the Giants dugout, Brian Sabean. Also on the ballot is another Bay Area general manager, Sandy Alderson, who built an A’s team that won three straight pennants and a World Series. On December 6 we’ll find out if any of them will be inducted next July 25, very possibly alongside former Giants superstar (and current president of baseball operations) Buster Posey, the top newcomer on the BBWAA ballot, which will be released on November 16.

There’s plenty more to digest regarding this ballot, which also includes two other World Series-winning managers in Joe Maddon and Lou Piniella, maverick owner Ted Turner, and pioneering executive Bill White. Piniella and White are the top two returnees from the 2024 slate that elected Jim Leyland. Piniella has missed by one vote in each of his past two appearances counting the 2019 Today’s Game Era Committee ballot from the previous four-committee format. White (who also played for the Giants, though it’s each candidate’s post-playing career that’s the focus here) missed by two votes on the 2024 ballot but was the recipient of this year’s Buck O’Neil Award, given once every three years to “an individual whose extraordinary efforts enhanced baseball’s positive impact on society, broadened the game’s appeal, and whose character, integrity and dignity are comparable to the qualities exhibited by O’Neil.” Of the eight candidates, Turner is the only one who is deceased; he died on May 6 at age 87.

2027 Contemporary Baseball Era Committee Managers/Umpires/Executives Ballot
Candidate Born-Died Category Most Recent Ballot Appearance
Dusty Baker 1949–Living Manager None (1st time)
Bruce Bochy 1955–Living Manager None (1st time)
Joe Maddon 1954–Living Manager None (1st time)
Lou Piniella 1943–Living Manager 2024 Contemporary Mgr/Exec/Umps (68.8%)
Sandy Alderson 1947–Living Executive None (1st time)
Brian Sabean 1956–Living Executive None (1st time)
Ted Turner 1938–2026 Executive None (1st time)
Bill White 1934–Living Executive 2024 Contemporary Mgr/Exec/Umps (62.5%)

I’ll have more to say about each of those candidates below and in the coming weeks, but first, some nuts and bolts. The eight candidates will be voted on by a 16-member committee of Hall of Famers, executives, and writer/historians that was appointed by the Hall’s board of directors. They will meet and discuss the candidates in person in San Diego on December 6, where the Winter Meetings would be held if not for the impending lockout by the owners. Each voter can include up to three candidates on his or her ballot (down from four in the previous 10-candidate format, which ran through the aforementioned 2022 ballots). Election to the Hall requires 75%, meaning votes from 12 of the 16 panelists. The results of the voting will be announced live on MLB Network’s MLB Tonight at 8:00 p.m. ET, and any candidate elected will be inducted into the Hall next July 25 in Cooperstown along with anyone elected from the upcoming BBWAA ballot. Read the rest of this entry »


Tai Peete Changed For the Better, Without Really Changing, After Becoming a Cardinal

Liam Keating/News-Leader / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Tai Peete has changed for the better since being acquired by the Cardinals from the Mariners as part of a three-team trade back in February. At least from a statistical standpoint. In 2025, the now 21-year-old outfielder left the yard 19 times for Seattle’s High-A affiliate, but he also fanned at a 30.6% clip while batting a lackluster .217 with a 79 wRC+. Those results were reflected in our prospect rankings. Peete fell out of our Top 100 entering the 2026 season, with his FV dropping two grades from a 50 to a far-less-bullish 40+.

This season was a different story. Acclimating well to his new environs, Peete put up a 126 wRC+ and a .296/.359/.549 slash line across 300 plate appearances between High-A Peoria and Double-A Springfield. (He also had 10 hitless at-bats rehabbing in the Florida Complex League.) Moreover, he lowered his strikeout rate to 26.9%. While not exactly Luis Arraez territory, the improved contact rate was a meaningful step in the right direction. As Eric Longenhagen wrote in last week’s Arizona Fall League Midseason Check-In, Peete’s “strikeouts have stabilized after they looked like they might be his undoing early in his career.”

The lefty swinger has continued doing damage since arriving in the desert. Over 72 plate appearances with the Peoria Javelinas, Peete has posted a .355/.431/.661 slash line, with 11 of his 22 hits going for extra bases. Taking ample advantage of his 60-grade speed, Peete has legged out four three-baggers and swiped 14 bags.

An unpublished observation from Eric merits mention. When I asked our lead prospect evaluator for an update a few days ago, he told me that Peete is “kind of in the Garrett Mitchell mold physically and swing-wise. He has posted some plus-plus run times this fall. Really seems fun to be around, too. Probably in that 45+ FV area for us now.” Read the rest of this entry »


Effectively Wild Episode 2552: The Best Things in Life Are Free Agents

EWFI
Ben Lindbergh and Meg Rowley banter about the Astros’ new GM hire and Bryce Harper’s comments about the likelihood of a lost season and his preference for the offseason over the season (22:22). Then FanGraphs’ Ben Clemens joins to break down the MLB free agent class: the weak crop of domestic players, the top NPB imports, the outlook for Tarik Skubal, the players who could have been available if they hadn’t signed extensions, the lockout looming over the market, and much more.

Audio intro: The Spaghettis, “Effectively Wild Theme”
Audio interstitial: Alex Glossman and Ali Breneman, “Effectively Wild Theme”
Audio outro: The Shirey Brothers, “Effectively Wild Theme”

Link to Clase-Ortiz trial story
Link to MLBTR on Flores
Link to Ben on ex-player GMs
Link to MLBTR on Brown
Link to Ng story
Link to “euphemism treadmill”
Link to Harper comments
Link to EW guests spreadsheet
Link to top 50 FA ranking
Link to Ben L. on free agency
Link to MLBTR on Reyes
Link to NPB offensive leaderboard
Link to posting details story
Link to MrSugarPenis story
Link to Oda story
Link to Nogami story
Link to MLBTR on qualifying offers

 Sponsor Us on Patreon
 Give a Gift Subscription
 Email Us: podcast@fangraphs.com
 Effectively Wild Subreddit
 Effectively Wild Wiki
 Apple Podcasts Feed 
 Spotify Feed
 YouTube Playlist
 Facebook Group
 Bluesky Account
 Twitter Account
 Get Our Merch!

01:29:01

The 2026 Pitching Superlatives, Part 1: Velocity

David Frerker and Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images

Awhile back I was staring at the pitch movement chart of one player or another, and I got to thinking about cutters and gyro sliders. Often, cutters and gyro sliders end up right in the middle of the those charts. The cutter is designed to split the difference between a breaking ball and a four-seam fastball, and as its name indicates, the gyro slider leaves the hand with gyroscopic spin, which stabilizes the flight of the ball. I started wondering who throws the truest pitch in baseball, the pitch that moves the absolute least. I’m going to write about that later this week. It’s not today’s topic, though, because once I started down that path, I found that it kept branching.

I started wondering about who throws the sweepiest sweepers and the fastest fastballs and the sinkiest sinkers. Which pitch hits the edges of the zone most often? Which pitch fools hitters into chasing and which pitch fools them into taking called strikes? Which pitch tricks batters into challenging those called strikes? Which pitches miss bats the most and by the furthest? Which pitches get pulled, or skied, or beaten into the ground the most? We’re looking for the most extreme pitches in baseball, so now that the 2026 season is over, we’re not leaving any of the path with leaves no step had trodden black. We’re going to spend the week handing out some superlatives. This is part one, and it’s going to be focused mainly on velocity. Read the rest of this entry »


Ben Clemens Top 50 Free Agents Chat – 11/2/26

Read the rest of this entry »


2027 Top 50 Free Agents

Jayne Kamin-Oncea-Imagn Images

Despair! Another baseball season is in the books, which means many months of inactivity before the games matter again. But rejoice! Because as we do every year, FanGraphs is releasing our ranking of the top 50 free agents available this winter. In the past, Dave Cameron, Kiley McDaniel, and Craig Edwards helmed this exercise; this is my sixth year in the driver’s seat. As usual, my real superpower here was collaboration; the entire FanGraphs staff contributed at every step in the process.

Below, I’ve provided contract estimates and rankings of the offseason’s top free agents, along with market-focused commentary for the top 25 players. A collection of FanGraphs writers – Davy Andrews (DA), Michael Baumann (MB), Brendan Gawlowski (BG), Jay Jaffe (JJ), David Laurila (DL), Eric Longenhagen (EL), Matt Martell (MM), Kiri Oler (KO), Matthew Roberson (MR), and Dan Szymborski (DS) – have supplied player-focused breakdowns for the entire top 50, designed to provide some context for each player at this point in their career. The two blurbs might overlap in places – player-focused breakdowns inevitably involve the market, and market-focused breakdowns inevitably involve the player – but combined, they’re designed give a fuller picture of how each player’s free agency might go and how the seasons to come might unfold. Huge thanks go to Meg Rowley for acting as a sounding board throughout the process, Eric and Brendan for their extensive contributions to my evaluation of the international players, Jason Martinez and Jon Becker for their market expertise, Dan for his early help providing projections, and Sean Dolinar for his technical assistance.

The players are ranked in the order in which I prefer them. That’s often the same as ranking them in the order of the value of the contracts I’m projecting, but not always. In some cases, I prefer a player I expect will get less money over one who stands to make more. I’ll generally make note of that in the accompanying commentary, but just to reiterate, this list isn’t exclusively sorted by descending guaranteed dollars. Read the rest of this entry »