Reddit - 全网主阵地

前往 Reddit 主页

登录 Reddit

打开设置菜单

信息流关于

最佳

打开排序选项

更改帖子视图

Analysts sound the alarm as Supreme Court sends Trump a 'galling' signal

u/RawStoryNews 头像

Analysts sound the alarm as Supreme Court sends Trump a 'galling' signal

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-supreme-court-2677208694/

r/scotus - Analysts sound the alarm as Supreme Court sends Trump a 'galling' signal

Advertisement: Real-time ergonomic risk feedback with AI-powered recommendations.

u/tumeke-ergonomics 头像

u/tumeke-ergonomics

• 已推广

Real-time ergonomic risk feedback with AI-powered recommendations.

tumeke.io

了解更多信息

If Clarence Thomas Wasn't a Supreme Court Justice He Would Have Already Been Charged With Felony Tax Fraud in Virginia.

u/Opposite-Mountain255 头像

u/Opposite-Mountain255

If Clarence Thomas Wasn't a Supreme Court Justice He Would Have Already Been Charged With Felony Tax Fraud in Virginia.

https://open.substack.com/pub/cmarmitage/p/clarence-thomas-could-be-charged?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=64gnd1

r/scotus - If Clarence Thomas Wasn't a Supreme Court Justice He Would Have Already Been Charged With Felony Tax Fraud in Virginia.

Supreme Court Split Hits New High as Tensions Boil Over

u/thedailybeast 头像

u/thedailybeast

Supreme Court Split Hits New High as Tensions Boil Over

https://www.thedailybeast.com/supreme-court-split-hits-new-high-as-tensions-boil-over/

r/scotus - Supreme Court Split Hits New High as Tensions Boil Over

创建于 2010年1月11日

公共

任何人均可在此社区中浏览内容、发帖和评论

22万 3893

r/scotus 规则

1

Stay on topic

r/scotus is dedicated to substantive, civil discussion of new developments in the law, legal system, and legal profession, but they must be related to the Supreme Court of the United States. In particular, articles about routine local law enforcement stories, police misconduct, proposed legislation, and electoral politics are usually off-topic unless there is some direct connection to an actual lawsuit. Trolling, sealioning, or purely partisan arguments are also forbidden.

2

Limit self-promotion.

r/scotus enforces the reddiquette guideline for self-promotion as a bright-line rule. Self-promotion must be less than 10% of a user's overall participation on the site. Violators are subject to immediate banning.

3

Keep headlines objective

Post titles should be either direct quotations from the linked article (preferably the title) or short, objective, accurate statements of the content of the linked article.

If you have a question about something in the news, submit a link to a news article on the issue and ask a question in the comments. Do not make a self-post with a question in the headline.

4

No soapboxing

r/scotus is a sub dedicated to substantive, civil discussion of new developments in SCOTUS, law, the legal system, and the legal profession. Soapboxing and slapfights (political and otherwise) are contrary to this purpose and will be removed. Violators are subject to immediate banning without warning.

5

Personal attacks

Personal attacks, trolling, flaming, etc. have no place in r/scotus. This is a subreddit for civilized discourse and participants are expected to treat each other with respect, even when disagreeing. If you are in a politically charged thread and someone disagrees with you, this is not cause to attack them personally. Violators may be subject to immediate banning in the moderator’s sole discretion.

6

Moderator Discretion

If you make this place worse, in the sole discretion of the mods, we'll ban you.

7

Don't Joke About Murdering Judges

Are you guys kidding with this? If you so much as make a Pelican Brief reference, it's an immediate ban, no exceptions, no warnings, no mercy.